ವಿಷಯಕ್ಕೆ ಹೋಗಿ

Get up Indians, hang him!

Do you think that whatever the Indian government and its ministers do are according to the secular principle?
If your answer is ‘YES’, then you need not read this article!
You might be well aware of the case of S.S.Sandhu, Superintendent of Police, Taran Taaran, who himself protected the people of Panjab from the brutal hands of terrorists in the 80s decade. He and his fellowmen had conducted many military operations against Sikh terrorists throughout Panjab and had strived hard to restore normalcy in the Panjab state. Later the National Human Right Commission of India filed many cases against him for he had, allegedly, violated the ‘human rights’ of terrorists! At that time no secularists, no human rights activists were present to advocate on behalf of Sandhu. Later Sandhu surrendered to death as he was unable to prove that he had not violated the ‘human rights’ of terrorists!
It is strange but true that many a times Indian ‘secularists’ and ‘human right’ activists advocate on behalf of anti-India elements!
Clemency to Afzal Guru, chief convicted in the Parliament attack case, is an additional incident.
As soon as the Supreme Court announced capital punishment to Afzal, many ‘secularists’ came out in protests against the Supreme Court verdict. Remember, these ‘secularists’ had never raised their voice for the victims of December 13 Parliament attack case, neither do they fight for the victims of Bombay blasts.
In the year 1998 when the Vajpayee government conducted nuclear tests in Pokhran, Arudhati Roy who is spearheading the ‘Clemency to Afzal’ campaign, had questioned the very need to test the nuclear weapons. “Why there was a need to spend crores of rupees on nuclear weapons when crores of Indians are starving in the streets?” was her question. Good, we must appreciate her concern towards poor people of India. Now we need to question Arundhati Roy;
“Sister Arundhati why did you advocate on behalf of notorious terrorist Afzal Guru when lakhs of innocent Kashmiri Hindus are being hunted by Pakistan sponsored terrorists?”
Very strange are the words ‘secularists’ in Afzal’s case. They say that ‘murder for murder’ is not humane. If this principle applies to all, then why did not our ‘secularists’ cried on behalf of Dhananjay Chatarjee? (Dhananjay was a Bengali and he had raped a girl and later had killed her). Why not our human right activists did shouted slogans like ‘murder for murder is not humane’ even in Dhananjay Chatarjee’s case?
Here the purpose of the article is not to say that Chatarjee was innocent. But purpose is that we must understand the dual character of Indian ‘secularists’.
The crime committed by Dhananjay Chatarjee was just a rape and murder – yes, just a rape and murder! Not an attack on the Parliament! But the crime committed by Afzal is very serious. If Afzal was successful in his attempt then he would have demolished the very heart of Indian democracy, he would have destroyed the very temple of secularism – the Parliament, he would have killed hundreds of political leaders and made India a ‘Banana Republic’! Whereas Chatarji had killed just a girl and, even though killing a girl or a boy is a heinous crime, it never jeopardizes the territorial integrity of the nation, it never makes India a ‘Banana Republic’.
Yes, it must be well understood that a rapist has no respect for women and for their feelings and whoever rapes a woman/girl must be hanged till death. No doubt in that.
But ask yourself a question; which is more important? – Sovereignty of the nation? Or life of a girl? Obviously the nation and its sovereignty are more important than a girl.
So our human rights activists and ‘secularists’ must have fought for clemency even to Dhananjay. If our ‘secularists’ really work for the sake of this country and for humanity they should have told ‘murder for murder is not humane’ even in the case of Dhananjay Chatarjee. But they did not.
Why? Was it because he was a poor man? Or was it because he was a Hindu?! – Yes, Hindu! It is well known that our secularists raise their voice only when minorities are tortured and they maintain a dumb-silence when the same happens to majority Hindus.
Arundhati Roy felt ashamed of her Indian identity when India conducted nuclear tests. But now we Indians feel ashamed to say that our ‘secularists’ fight for anti-India terrorists who are striving hard to destroy the secular fabric of this country. We feel ashamed to say that our ‘secularists’ maintain a dumb-silence over the issue of genocide in Kashmir!
Not only Arundhati but many of our political leaders have, till now, maintained a pin-drop silence over the issue of clemency to Afzal. The Congress party has not yet opened its mouth on this issue. The Communist comrades have come out openly supporting Afzal family’s plea for Presidential clemency.
It is a shame for India that a terrorist whose involvement in the Parliament attack case has been proved beyond-any-doubt is getting an unprecedented support from the ‘secular’ brigade.
It is a humble request for ‘secularists’ to work neither for Muslims, nor for Christians, nor for Hindus! Work for Indians! Stop your cry over clemency to Afzal Guru.
If ever the Man Mohan Singh government not take appropriate action against Afzal and gives him the clemency then it would become a healing touch for anti-India groups.
Get up, hang him!
- Vijay Joshi

ಕಾಮೆಂಟ್‌ಗಳು

vishalmkamath ಹೇಳಿದ್ದಾರೆ…
yes what the article you have posted might be right but we dont know exactly what has happened watch the role of media here once a reputed news channel made an poll asking people whether to hang afzal or not it got the answer that he must be hanged previously it had even said that he should be hanged the word pity/pardon should not be a boon for such people the same news channel after some 2-3 days gave a special report on thier channel saying afzal was innocent he was made scape goat by the delhi police and the politicians. Please observe this statements the media had made, think what the people like us should think whether he is innocent or the real master mind behind the parliament attack now really what the people has to do to support afzal or to ask the govt to hang him if he is a real master mind i think he should be hanged untill death or else he should be tortured cruelly if he is a scape goat then what to do??? this type of questions come in people like us

please post a article on our reservation policy and minority group and how politicians/n.h.r.c play/use it when they require

ಈ ಬ್ಲಾಗ್‌ನ ಜನಪ್ರಿಯ ಪೋಸ್ಟ್‌ಗಳು

ಮರೆಯಲಾಗದ ಕಾಮತರು: ಮಾಧವರಾಯರ ಒಂದು ನೆನಪು!

ನಮ್ಮ ತಲೆಮಾರಿನ ಪತ್ರಕರ್ತರು ಕಂಡ 'ಪತ್ರಿಕಾ ರಂಗದ ಭೀಷ್ಮ'ನ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಬರೆಯಬೇಕು ಅನಿಸುತ್ತಿದೆ. ಆ ಭೀಷ್ಮ ಯಾರು ಎಂಬ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ಬೇಡ - ಅವರು ಮಾಧವ ವಿಠಲ ಕಾಮತ್ (ಎಂ.ವಿ. ಕಾಮತ್) ಅಲ್ಲದೆ ಬೇರೆ ಯಾರೂ ಅಲ್ಲ. ಅವರ ಬಗ್ಗೆಯೇ ಯಾಕೆ ಬರೆಯಬೇಕು ಅನಿಸುತ್ತಿದೆ ಎಂಬ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆಗೆ ಉತ್ತರ ಇಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೆ ಎಂಬತ್ತು ವರ್ಷ ವಯಸ್ಸು ದಾಟಿದ ನಂತರವೂ ಎಳೆಯ ಯುವಕನಂತೆ ಕಾಣಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಕಾಮತರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಬರೆಯಬೇಕು ಎಂದು ಹಲವು ದಿನಗಳಿಂದ ಅಂದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿದ್ದೆ ಎಂಬುದಂತೂ ನಿಜ. ನಾನು ಪದವಿ ವ್ಯಾಸಂಗ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ದಿನಗಳು ಅವು. ಒಂದು ದಿನ ದೂರವಾಣಿ ಕರೆ ಮಾಡಿದ ಹರೀಶ್ ಆದೂರು ಅವರು (ಆಗ ಹರೀಶ್ ಅವರು ಸಂಯುಕ್ತ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ದಿನಪತ್ರಿಕೆಯ ಮಂಗಳೂರು ಆವೃತ್ತಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಕೆಲಸ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದರು), 'ಈ ವಾರದ ಅಂತ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಮನೆಯಂಗಳದಲ್ಲಿ ಸಾಹಿತ್ಯ ಸಂಜೆ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮ ಇದೆ. ನೀನೂ ಬಾ. ಅಲ್ಲಿ ನಿನಗೆ ನಾಲ್ಕು ಒಳ್ಳೆಯ ಮಾತುಗಳನ್ನು ಕೇಳುವ ಅವಕಾಶ ಸಿಗಬಹುದು' ಎಂದು ಆಹ್ವಾನ ನೀಡಿದರು. 'ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮದ ಅತಿಥಿ ಯಾರು' ಎಂದು ಪ್ರಶ್ನಿಸಿದೆ. 'ಎಂ.ವಿ. ಕಾಮತರು ಮಾರಾಯಾ' ಎಂದು ಉತ್ತರಿಸಿ ಫೋನ್ ಇಟ್ಟರು. ಶನಿವಾರ ಬಂತು. ಅಂದಿನ ತರಗತಿಗಳು ಮುಗಿದಿದ್ದವು. ಸರಿ, ಕಾಮತರ ಮಾತು ಕೇಳಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳುವ ಅವಕಾಶ ತಪ್ಪಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಾರದು ಎಂಬ ಉದ್ದೇಶದಿಂದ ಮೂಡುಬಿದಿರೆ ಬಸ್‌ ಸ್ಟ್ಯಾಂಡ್‌ಗೆ ಹೋಗಿ, ಬೆಳ್ತಂಗಡಿ ಕಡೆ ಹೋಗುವ ಬಸ್ ಹತ್ತಿದೆ. ಜ

ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮದ ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿ ಮಿತ್ರರಿಗೆ...

ನಾನಿನ್ನೂ ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮದ ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿ. ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮದಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ನಾತಕೋತ್ತರ ಪದವಿ ಪಡೆಯಲು ಇನ್ನೂ ಎರಡು ವರ್ಷ ಕಾಯಬೇಕು. ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮದ ಜಂಜಡಗಳ ನೇರ ಅನುಭವವಿಲ್ಲ. ಪತ್ರಿಕಾರಂಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಎದುರಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿರುವ ಸವಾಲುಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಕೇಳಿ ಗೊತ್ತೆ ಹೊರತು ಸ್ವಲ್ಪವೂ ಅನುಭವಿಸಿ ಗೊತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ. ಹಾಗಾಗಿ ಈ ಹೊತ್ತಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಇಂಥ ಒಂದು ಲೇಖನವನ್ನು ಬರೆಯುವುದು ಸರಿಯೋ ತಪ್ಪೋ ಎಂಬ ಪ್ರಶ್ನೆ ನನ್ನನ್ನು ಹಲವು ಬಾರಿ ಕಾಡಿದೆ. ಆದರೂ ಈ ವಿಷಯವನ್ನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮುಂದೆ ಹೇಳಿಕೊಳ್ಳದಿದ್ದರೆ ಸಮಾಧಾನವಿಲ್ಲ ಅಂತ ಅನಿಸಿದ್ದರಿಂದ "ಬರೆಯಬೇಕು, ಬರೆಯುತ್ತೇನೆ" ಎಂದು ನಿರ್ಧರಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ. ರಾಜ್ಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮದಲ್ಲಿ ಪದವಿಯನ್ನು ನೀಡುವ ಹಲವಾರು ಕಾಲೇಜುಗಳು ಹುಟ್ಟಿಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿವೆ. ಹಲವಾರು ಪ್ರತಿಷ್ಠಿತ ಕಾಲೇಜುಗಳು ತಮ್ಮ ಮಾನವಿಕ ವಿಭಾಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮವನ್ನೂ ಒಂದು ಆಯ್ಕೆಯ ವಿಷಯವನ್ನಾಗಿ ಸೇರಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ. ಇತಿಹಾಸ, ರಾಜ್ಯಶಾಸ್ತ್ರ, ಅರ್ಥಶಾಸ್ತ್ರಗಳಂತೆ ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮವನ್ನೂ ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರೀಯವಾಗಿ ಓದುವ ಅವಕಾಶ ಇಂದಿನ ಯುವಕರಿಗೆ ಇದೆ. ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮವನ್ನು ಇಷ್ಟೊಂದು ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರೀಯವಾಗಿ ಓದಿದ್ದರೂ ನಾವು ಕೆಲವೊಮ್ಮೆ ವರ್ತಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವ ರೀತಿ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಬೇಸರ ಮೂಡಿಸುತ್ತಿದೆ. ಮೊನ್ನೆ ಪತ್ರಿಕೋದ್ಯಮ ಓದುತ್ತಿರುವ ನನ್ನ ಹಳೆಯ ಸ್ನೇಹಿತರೊಬ್ಬರ ಜೊತೆ ಮಾತನಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾಗ ಭಾರತೀಯ ಮೂಲದ ವಿಶ್ವದ ಶ್ರೇಷ್ಠ ಪತ್ರಿಕೆಯೊಂದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಮಾತು ಬಂತು. ಸುಮಾರು ನ

Remember, we have sisters at home…

He was a married man of 30 and had two kids. What’s more, he had a loving spouse who loved him more than anybody could love! He was workin g in a sales promoting company where he, for the second time, fell in love with a charming lady. She was his colleague of 25 and single who loved him in spite of knowing his marital status. Suddenly one day he decided to marry his girlfriend and hence divorced his wife. His new wife didn’t had to wait long to witness his ugly face. She had to face many irking words daily. He used to beat her daily and force himself on her whenever she refused to respond to his sexual urges. She was actually raped by the same man whom, she thought, she loved! The above story is not one of Ekta Kapoor’s ‘K’ series, but is the story of hundreds of Indian women. Now imagine a married woman trying to marry for the second time when her husband is still alive! Imagine a mother of two kids falling in love with a man younger to her or at least imagine a widow expressing her